Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bandwith limit with pscp (parallel scp) #93

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Sep 1, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Bandwith limit with pscp (parallel scp) #93

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Sep 1, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I would like limit the bandwidth pscp may use when copying.
This is very useful if we want to copy a huge amount of data
without suffering from slow network for a long time. 

Limiting bandwidth is done asily be achieved using the "scp -l" switch.

Could you implement a new swicth (to pscp) to pass the bandwith option to scp?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by frphoe...@gmail.com on 30 Dec 2013 at 4:34

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

You should be able to use the "-x" and/or "-X" options to pass options to pscp 
that are "forwarded" to scp. Thanks to these options, there doesn't need to be 
a a custom pscp option for each and every possible scp option. Does this help 
answer your question? Thanks.

Original comment by amcn...@google.com on 30 Dec 2013 at 4:40

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Yes; it make sense to use these options. Thanks.

Original comment by frphoe...@gmail.com on 30 Dec 2013 at 4:58

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Great!

Original comment by amcna...@gmail.com on 30 Dec 2013 at 5:33

  • Changed state: Done

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

But how can I transfer -l option to scp, when -l is also used by pscp for 
different purpose?
I am trying to run pscp -l 100 ... but it doesn't work.
Can somebody give an example?

Original comment by kalin...@gmail.com on 14 Nov 2014 at 8:57

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant