We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
感谢作者的伟大贡献,我在detectron2环境下训练了自己的数据集,训练时输出了使用的增强策略,发现和论文中的表9的增强策略有些不一样,这是为什么呢? {'zoom_out': {'prob': 0.30000000000000004, 'level': 9}, 'zoom_in': {'prob': 0.25, 'level': 3}} {'policies': [[('Color', 0.4, 2), ('translateX', 0.4, 4)], [('Brightness', 0.2, 4), ('rotate', 0.4, 2)], [('Sharpness', 0.4, 2), ('shearX', 0.2, 6)], [('SolarizeAdd', 0.2, 2), ('hflip', 0.5, 1)], [('Color', 0.0, 8), ('translateY', 0.2, 8)]], 'scale_ratios': {'area': [7, 5, 1], 'prob': [3, 3, 3]}} 论文中的表9的增强策略
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
你好,我当时应该是进来了多次搜索,搜索到的结果会有所波动。两个策略其实差别非常小,我开源的时候找了个稳定性比较好的开源了。您也可以考虑改回文章中的那个,效果差不多的。
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
感谢作者的伟大贡献,我在detectron2环境下训练了自己的数据集,训练时输出了使用的增强策略,发现和论文中的表9的增强策略有些不一样,这是为什么呢?
{'zoom_out': {'prob': 0.30000000000000004, 'level': 9}, 'zoom_in': {'prob': 0.25, 'level': 3}}
{'policies':
[[('Color', 0.4, 2), ('translateX', 0.4, 4)],
[('Brightness', 0.2, 4), ('rotate', 0.4, 2)],
[('Sharpness', 0.4, 2), ('shearX', 0.2, 6)],
[('SolarizeAdd', 0.2, 2), ('hflip', 0.5, 1)],
[('Color', 0.0, 8), ('translateY', 0.2, 8)]],
'scale_ratios': {'area': [7, 5, 1], 'prob': [3, 3, 3]}}
论文中的表9的增强策略
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: