Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fuzzing dictionary #174

Open
dgryski opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

fuzzing dictionary #174

dgryski opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@dgryski
Copy link
Contributor

dgryski commented Dec 18, 2017

Both libfuzzer and afl support dictionaries for interesting keywords to use when fuzzing. It would be nice if go-fuzz had similar capabilities.
@dvyukov
Copy link
Owner

dvyukov commented Dec 18, 2017

Where does static analysis and comparison interception fail? The more manual work we require the worse.

@dgryski
Copy link
Contributor Author

dgryski commented Dec 18, 2017

I saw this mentioned in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6kP-CWO_0Q with regards to libxml. I had no specific failing use case that this would solve.

@mvdan
Copy link
Contributor

mvdan commented Mar 6, 2018

I find that prepopulating the corpus with inputs from the tests is enough for go-fuzz to get to good results in a matter of minutes.

@roddux roddux mentioned this issue Apr 8, 2021
Open
@vfsrfs vfsrfs mentioned this issue Jan 12, 2022
Merged
@disconnect3d disconnect3d mentioned this issue Feb 23, 2022
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dgryski @dvyukov @mvdan