Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A strongly-named assembly is required for DynamicExpresso.Core #52

Open
EvgeniyKom opened this issue Dec 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@EvgeniyKom
Copy link

Hello! We are using your assembly through the Nuget package. Could you please sign your assemblies with a strong name, because it's imposible to use it from other strong named assembly.

Thanks!

@davideicardi davideicardi added this to the 2.0 milestone Dec 4, 2016
@davideicardi
Copy link
Member

Hello Evgeniy, currently I prefer to don't release a strongly signed assembly. Consider that this is an open source project, so if I strongly sign it then I should also put the key somewhere. Not in the source code otherwise the signing process doesn't make any sense (anyone can alter it...) and for now I prefer to keep the build process simple and just release a single version.

I suggest you to fork the project in a private repository that you can trust (or in a public repository but keep the key outside) and create a signed version of the assembly that you can guarantee, because only you have the key to rebuild.

In any case I will think about this requirement for the future...

thanks

@davideicardi davideicardi removed this from the 2.0 milestone Jan 12, 2017
@tongbong
Copy link

tongbong commented Sep 1, 2017

+1

It would be so nice to have a nuget package with a signed version of the assrmbly. What a burden to have to fork just to sign the assembly.

I do not like much signing as well but once an assembly is signed the signature chain has to be respected.

@tongbong
Copy link

Maybe this could help:
angularsen/UnitsNet#262

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants