-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review Zencode overloading of copy
verb in too many statements
#609
Comments
One solution is to leverage the
|
Copying data from a path can also be done by combining copy statements with pointer statement explained in #208. In this way this can also be used with move and other statements. |
Updated list:
|
proposal: |
Thinking about it this will make it really difficult to find deprecated statements and with this we should also modify all move statements that are written following the the same logic. I propose to
In this way the updates are:
|
Yes to all deprecations suggested! flagged in v3 and removed in v4. I am unsure about the double from: it may be handy to use |
Yes, nice to have. In my opinion, pointers will still be useful when we want to do more operations on a nested table |
There is ambiguity in the use of copy and some redundancy solved by
pickup
from paths.Review current situation:
It makes sense to leverage
get
orpickup
when copying out to the root elements inside dictionaries while usingcopy ... from ... to
to indicate from dictionary to dictionary.Wish (not yet implemented):
Current ambiguity (collides):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: