We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In issue #12 you were kind enough to explicitly move ragg under the LGPL to be compatible with Racket.
ragg
Racket is about to be relicensed under Apache+MIT.
For this reason, would you consider relicensing ragg under the MIT license, so it can remain maximally compatible with Racket’s licensing? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FWIW Racket’s relicensing under MIT is now complete.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
In issue #12 you were kind enough to explicitly move
ragg
under the LGPL to be compatible with Racket.Racket is about to be relicensed under Apache+MIT.
For this reason, would you consider relicensing
ragg
under the MIT license, so it can remain maximally compatible with Racket’s licensing? Thanks.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: