Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

map:for-each or map:for-each-entry ? #30

Closed
wahowaho opened this issue Dec 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

map:for-each or map:for-each-entry ? #30

wahowaho opened this issue Dec 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@wahowaho
Copy link

wahowaho commented Dec 6, 2019

eXist-db/exist#2512 # What is the problem

image
image
image

What did you expect

website content is wrong?

Describe how to reproduce or add a test

Context information

Please always add the following information

  • eXist-db 5.0.x /
  • java version "1.8.0_171"
  • win10
  • 64 bit
    -jar
  • Any custom changes in e.g. conf.xml no
@wahowaho wahowaho closed this as completed Dec 6, 2019
@duncdrum duncdrum transferred this issue from eXist-db/exist Dec 6, 2019
@adamretter
Copy link
Member

@SnowMakerDemo there is no such function as map:for-each-entry, you likely want map:for-each or map:for-each-pair

@dizzzz
Copy link
Member

dizzzz commented Dec 10, 2019

@dizzzz dizzzz reopened this Dec 10, 2019
@dizzzz dizzzz added the bug label Dec 10, 2019
@wahowaho
Copy link
Author

@adamretter @dizzzz thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants