Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New prescribing data import may miss practices or chemicals #368

Closed
sebbacon opened this issue Mar 17, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

New prescribing data import may miss practices or chemicals #368

sebbacon opened this issue Mar 17, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@sebbacon
Copy link
Contributor

There is a constraint on the prescribing table to ensure we have corresponding chemicals and practices.

Since we've started using the detailed prescribing data, this doesn't come with chemicals and practices files, so we'll have to deal with the possibility of missing data another way.

I'm thinking about removing the constraint and adding a report procedure that highlights missing relations for manual intervention.

@sebbacon sebbacon added next now and removed next labels Mar 20, 2017
@sebbacon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Relates to #367

@sebbacon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that we no longer link directly to the Chemicals table from prescribing, so that particular constraint is no longer relevant.

@sebbacon sebbacon self-assigned this Mar 20, 2017
sebbacon referenced this issue Mar 22, 2017
…s-#368

Create dummy practices if they're missing
@sebbacon sebbacon removed the now label Mar 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant