You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The repository mentions two different licenses: The "Eclipse Distribution License v. 1.0" and the "BSD 3-Clause" license. It is not really clear, which is applicable to the project, EDL, BSD or both.
pom.xml: Both in comment, EDL in metadata
LICENSE.md: BSD
NOTICE.md: both
Source code comments: both
Expected behavior
I should be able to see the correct licence in all those places. As far as I can see, the EDL has no official SPDX identifier, so if one wants to keep the SPDX-conformant headers and the license is, in fact, EDL, a new identifier should be requested
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
The repository mentions two different licenses: The "Eclipse Distribution License v. 1.0" and the "BSD 3-Clause" license. It is not really clear, which is applicable to the project, EDL, BSD or both.
pom.xml
: Both in comment, EDL in metadataLICENSE.md
: BSDNOTICE.md
: bothSource code comments
: bothExpected behavior
I should be able to see the correct licence in all those places. As far as I can see, the EDL has no official SPDX identifier, so if one wants to keep the SPDX-conformant headers and the license is, in fact, EDL, a new identifier should be requested
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: