New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update JNLP memory to 3gb (a little higher than 2176Mi) as 6GB may be too big (Jenkins ran for about an hour and was still looking for a large enough node to use) #347
Conversation
… too big (Jenkins ran for about an hour and was still looking for a large enough node to use) Signed-off-by: Scott Marlow <smarlow@redhat.com>
The max(limit) memory & cpu for each agent will be fixed. I dont remember the correct maximum number currently applied to the agents in CI. If this change does not solve we can request the eclipse infra guys(mikael/Fred) to provide the maximum available memory & CPU for each agents in the CI now and review our configuration. |
with 3gb, the Jenkins test jobs are running again. If we see any overall improvement in stability, that will be a hint that we need to better configure memory use. We could also break up the current TCK tests into small groups. Currently, I see 24 nodes running TCK tests via https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/computer (with jobs still pending for an available node to run on). I'm not sure of how many nodes were running when we had the TCK Jenkins JNLP memory size at 2176MB, however, I think we need to get stability in our jobs. I agree it would be helpful to understand total available memory + CPU. For general knowledge, the configure-pod-container/assign-memory-resource describes setting a memory request (initial memory size that it at least needs) and limit (max memory size that we can grow to). We are only setting a memory limit currently. If we find that some tests require less memory, we should determine the minimum memory size and set limit to that. |
https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jakartaee-tck/job/master/735/console is still running, when it is done we should have our answer if using 3gb helps. |
@alwin-joseph it looks like the increase to 3gb helped, as in the end of the consoleText output (which I downloaded), I see the following unexpected output (at the end of appmanagedNoTx test run):
Do you know why we see |
I think so too. I have noticed that long time back, but did not try to check further. But we did verify the total count of tests in all the vehicles to match that with javaee8 resutls. |
Great, thanks! |
Signed-off-by: Scott Marlow smarlow@redhat.com