Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Model Deprecation]: JustInSequencePart 2.0.0 #608

Open
3 tasks done
johannsvarela opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
3 tasks done

[Model Deprecation]: JustInSequencePart 2.0.0 #608

johannsvarela opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
MS1_Approved Checklist "MS1 Request for Model Developement" is approved.

Comments

@johannsvarela
Copy link
Contributor

johannsvarela commented Feb 5, 2024 •
edited by agg3fe
Loading

Update Reason

Since the existing JustInSequencePart was adapted and a new version (#563) will be available soon, the current version JustInSequencePart 2.0.0 must be set deprecated!

MS1 Criteria

  • The model that should be deprecated exists and is not deprecated already
  • The respective model does not affect existing use cases (aspect is either used in higher versions or replaced by a different aspect)
  • A shared aspect, which will be deprecated, is not used by any released aspect model
@johannsvarela
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI @jacewski-bosch @jonbckr @BenediktMuellerIML

@johannsvarela
Copy link
Contributor Author

modeling_team

@johannsvarela johannsvarela mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2024
Closed
28 tasks
@agg3fe agg3fe added the MS1_Approved Checklist "MS1 Request for Model Developement" is approved. label Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
MS1_Approved Checklist "MS1 Request for Model Developement" is approved.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[Model Deprecation]: JustInSequencePart 2.0.0 johannsvarela/sldt-semantic-models
2 participants
@agg3fe @johannsvarela