Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix outdated bundle vendor #2899

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 19, 2018
Merged

Fix outdated bundle vendor #2899

merged 2 commits into from Oct 19, 2018

Conversation

quaff
Copy link
Contributor

@quaff quaff commented Sep 12, 2018

Jetty version will always be "9.4.z-SNAPSHOT" not exact "9.4.8.v20171121".

Signed-off-by: Yanming Zhou <zhouyanming@gmail.com>
@janbartel
Copy link
Contributor

@quaff I don't understand the necessity for the changes here - looks like you've just changed the Implementation-Vendor entry in the manifest? Can you explain what the problem is you want to fix?

I just ran jetty-9.4.12 release (from the distro) and I got the proper version as I expect:

2018-09-12 13:50:51.925:INFO:oejs.Server:main: jetty-9.4.12.v20180830; built: 2018-08-30T13:59:14.071Z; git: 2720868; jvm 1.8.0_172-b11

@janbartel janbartel self-assigned this Sep 12, 2018
@gregw
Copy link
Contributor

gregw commented Sep 12, 2018

@janbartel I'm guessing it has something to do with the bundle vendor in the jetty-all aggregate being "Eclipse Jetty Project"
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/jetty-9.4.x/aggregates/jetty-all/src/main/resources/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF#L4

@quaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

quaff commented Sep 12, 2018

Yes, I'm using jetty-all.

@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
<Bundle-ManifestVersion>2</Bundle-ManifestVersion>
<Bundle-Name>${project.name}</Bundle-Name>
<Bundle-SymbolicName>${bundle-symbolic-name}.source</Bundle-SymbolicName>
<Bundle-Vendor>Eclipse.org - Jetty</Bundle-Vendor>
<Bundle-Vendor>Eclipse Jetty Project</Bundle-Vendor>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it probably should be called "Eclipse Jetty Project".
WDYT @jmcc0nn3ll ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is what it is in most of our jars, so let's be consistent

Copy link
Contributor

@gregw gregw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
<Bundle-ManifestVersion>2</Bundle-ManifestVersion>
<Bundle-Name>${project.name}</Bundle-Name>
<Bundle-SymbolicName>${bundle-symbolic-name}.source</Bundle-SymbolicName>
<Bundle-Vendor>Eclipse.org - Jetty</Bundle-Vendor>
<Bundle-Vendor>Eclipse Jetty Project</Bundle-Vendor>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is what it is in most of our jars, so let's be consistent

Copy link
Contributor

@joakime joakime left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough change.
+1 from me.

@joakime joakime merged commit edc4781 into jetty:jetty-9.4.x Oct 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants