Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SHACL - only initialize once #1463

Closed
hmottestad opened this issue Jun 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

SHACL - only initialize once #1463

hmottestad opened this issue Jun 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
🐞 bug issue is a bug M1 Fixed in milestone 1 📦 SHACL affects the SHACL validator
Milestone
3.0.0

Comments

@hmottestad
Copy link
Contributor

Calling initialize() multiple times should not make a difference.
@hmottestad hmottestad added 🐞 bug issue is a bug 📦 SHACL affects the SHACL validator labels Jun 23, 2019
@hmottestad hmottestad added this to the 3.0 milestone Jun 23, 2019
hmottestad added a commit to eclipse/rdf4j-storage that referenced this issue Jun 23, 2019
@hmottestad
eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1463 check if already initialized
8fe041b 
Signed-off-by: Håvard Ottestad <hmottestad@gmail.com>
@hmottestad hmottestad mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2019
Merged
hmottestad added a commit to eclipse/rdf4j-storage that referenced this issue Jun 23, 2019
@hmottestad
eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1463 check if already initialized
4567d36 
Signed-off-by: Håvard Ottestad <hmottestad@gmail.com>
hmottestad added a commit to eclipse/rdf4j-storage that referenced this issue Jun 23, 2019
@hmottestad
eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1463 check if already initialized
c7bd5e6 
Signed-off-by: Håvard Ottestad <hmottestad@gmail.com>
@abrokenjester abrokenjester added the M1 Fixed in milestone 1 label Jun 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🐞 bug issue is a bug M1 Fixed in milestone 1 📦 SHACL affects the SHACL validator
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@abrokenjester @hmottestad