New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Split RDF4J Project #915
Comments
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Great idea btw. Just wondering, will concurrent releases of all of the RDF4J artifacts still be made? |
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Fix eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#915: Keep only benchmark and testsuites
Fix eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#915: split project
@jamesrdf From the practical point of view today all parts are just forks of the same repository. For example code for By scenario I mean giving response to following questions:
|
Great question! The develop branch of /eclipse/rdf4j, /eclipse/rdf4j-storage, /eclipse/rdf4j-tools, and /eclipse/rdf4j-testsuite don't overlap with one another. For any 2.3 code changes these develop branches for the corresponding github project is to be used. We will use /eclipse/rdf4j/tree/master for any 2.2.x code changes until 2.3 is released in the new year. The master branch of storage/tools/testsuites should not be modified (or used) in any way until after 2.3 is released. Once 2.3 is released the develop branch of all these github projects will be copied to their master branches and used for any 2.3.x patch releases. New issues and new pull-requests for 2.3 should be created in a corresponding github project. No need to close/reopen issues, instead reference existing issues/PRs from /eclipse/rdf4j using the cross referencing syntax: https://help.github.com/articles/autolinked-references-and-urls/ 2.2.x shouldn't have much changes before 2.3 is released, so I don't expect porting 2.2.x PRs to 2.3 to be much of an issue. However, contributors will have to be careful to target their PRs to the develop branch of the correct github project! There will be some scenarios that require changes to multiple github projects, which will require multiple PRs, which will have to be merged in the correct order to ensure the build does not break in the process. To contribute checkout the develop branch of one (or more) of the github projects and have at it. This issue has been resolved for 2.3 codebase, so no need to follow any special branches (just their develop branches). |
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Issue eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#915: Link benchmark module to parent testsuite
Signed-off-by: James Leigh <james.leigh@ontotext.com>
Split RDF4J Project into the following
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: