New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Redefine relation between charging station and parking #13596
Comments
I think it has advantages to keep parkingAreas and chargingStations as distinct concepts since they can exist without each other (i.e for inductive charging along a road). suggestion:
|
@behrisch @palvarezlopez For discussion: What about the relation parkingArea -> chargingStation? Should it also be restricted to 1:1 or should a 1:n relation be allowed (with which semantics)? |
Postponed until @behrisch returns |
Signed-off-by: m-kro <m.barthauer@t-online.de>
Signed-off-by: m-kro <m.barthauer@t-online.de>
Signed-off-by: m-kro <m.barthauer@t-online.de>
Currently, vehicles can be charged at parking spaces if their stop definition includes both the parking and the charging station (and the position definitions of charging and parking elements overlap enough). This means there is no direct link between a specific parking area and a charging station. Some consequences:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: