Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalization of QTL mapping #335

Open
veitveit opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Generalization of QTL mapping #335

veitveit opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
concept/term addition Request for a new concept(s), or change(s) to existing concept(s) polishing Does not extend the content or functionality, but improves other qualities question Further information is requested

Comments

@veitveit
Copy link

veitveit commented Dec 4, 2017

QTL mapping is so far narrow synonym of genetic mapping but is also applicable to other chromatin features such as histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, ...

Solution 1: Leave as is and generalize definition of genetic mapping

Solution 2: Diversify children of DNA mapping to include all chromatin features

@veitveit veitveit added concept/term addition Request for a new concept(s), or change(s) to existing concept(s) polishing Does not extend the content or functionality, but improves other qualities labels Dec 4, 2017
@joncison joncison added the question Further information is requested label Jun 26, 2018
@joncison
Copy link
Contributor

joncison commented Jun 26, 2018

Currently we have:

  • Genetic mapping hasNarrowSynonym QTL mapping
    but
  • Haplotype mapping is_a Genetic mapping

So there's a discrepancy in the modelling. I think my preference is

Solution 1: Leave as is and generalize definition of genetic mapping - but that would mean deprecating Haplotype mapping making this a narrowSynonym. This makes EDAM simpler == good.

Unless there are many examples of tools which e.g. do Haplotype mapping but not QTL mapping, in which case Solution 2 may be preferable.

I rather suspect the tools out there, each do various types of Genetic mapping, hence Solution 1, but I'd like some advise here cc @veitveit @matuskalas

@matuskalas
Copy link
Member

A hard question...

We can also consider either 2 separate but overlapping concepts, or hasRelatedSynonym. I also guess that QTL mapping is perhaps a more often used term than Genetic mapping, but that may not be the most relevant criterium.

@joncison joncison added this to the 1.23 milestone Jun 11, 2019
@joncison joncison removed this from the 1.23 milestone Jul 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
concept/term addition Request for a new concept(s), or change(s) to existing concept(s) polishing Does not extend the content or functionality, but improves other qualities question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants