You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be interesting to have a comparision, pros/cons. IIUC binary-gentoo is mainly to maintain binary packages (for distribution), rather than building docker images. The binary packages are built in Docker containers, and the tool is written in Python.
Found that tool as well, recently. From what i see, Binary Gentoo builds packages in Docker to be used without Docker and Kubler builds packages to be used with Docker. So, beside both tools using Docker, i don't see allot similarities. I haven't yet tried the Binary Gentoo but having binary packages is a (optional?) side product of Kubler and by that, a feature i am not using outside of rebuilding containers.
I might still try Binary Gentoo at some point as it might be handy to test custom Ebuilds. I am currently using a VM for that.
There's a somewhat similar tool binary-gentoo.
It would be interesting to have a comparision, pros/cons. IIUC binary-gentoo is mainly to maintain binary packages (for distribution), rather than building docker images. The binary packages are built in Docker containers, and the tool is written in Python.
I raised same thing on their end hartwork/binary-gentoo#79
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: