New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support creating the codebook #119
Comments
Requirements listed by one of the users about what a codebook feature should contain (from here – access protected link):
|
Currently "blocked" as we'll need some more detailed discussion with users about how this feature should look like. |
A codebook shows the collection of codes used in an ethnographic study together with information about what they mean / how they are supposed to be used. This could also include other meta-information about the codes (usage frequency, author etc.).
To support creating the codebook, we'd want three things:
Live view of the codebook, optionally public. A comfortable, well formatted way to read the codebook inside the Open Ethnographer software. So unlike when editing the code description of one code, here all code descriptions would be rendered in a type of document. It should be possible to configure Open Ethnographer for making this document publicly viewable, to allow doing "open notebook science" in online ethnography.
Export to a codebook document. The software would allow to export a codebook document for a collection of codes. The exported format could simply be Markdown, which can then be transformed to other formats with external tools. The collection of codes would be defined via a coding project (Projects feature #222, already implemented).
A code discussion function. In the early phases of the NGI project, we discovered that ethnographers need to discuss and comment their codebook a lot during its development. I proposed to add a "Start a discussion on this code" button to the page of each code to generate a Discourse topic to discuss the code. The idea is to not add any redundant functionality for discussions, but to re-use Discourse for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: