You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Under 8. - Awesome that we're getting the spatial join to work, but is it possible to work on the legend? It's pretty impossible to interpret right now. Maybe we could have a discrete scale that described the range instead? Or at least do some unit conversions? Not sure what's easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yea it's pretty bad. Unfortunately, it's the default for this mapping utility, and I'm not sure how editable it is. But there are other ways of "binning" or classifying the data to produce better results. Will experiment
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in seven days if no further activity occurs. If it should not be closed, please comment! Thank you for your contributions.
Under 8. - Awesome that we're getting the spatial join to work, but is it possible to work on the legend? It's pretty impossible to interpret right now. Maybe we could have a discrete scale that described the range instead? Or at least do some unit conversions? Not sure what's easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: