Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Go further and implements IdentityServer4 #29

Closed
thiagolunardi opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Go further and implements IdentityServer4 #29

thiagolunardi opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 6 comments
Milestone

Comments

@thiagolunardi
Copy link
Contributor

Implements a further segregation of Identity service and use IdentityServer4 and full isolate it as running service.

@EduardoPires EduardoPires added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Aug 15, 2017
@davesunny1985
Copy link

hi there,

How can I have async Controllers in the project?
It would be great if you have guide me on that. And also do I need to use MQ or MediatR etc. for Async operation?

Please let me know

Thanks & Regards,
Sunny Dave

@thiagolunardi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davesunny1985 , please, create a new issue with you question, buddy.

@CanMehmetK
Copy link

Isolating Identity Server and Using Web Api kind another project has pros and cons
I am using this project and aproach becouse ; its KISS

I mentioned ASP.NET Boiler Plate and Zero its very well designed but too complex and
hard to work with...

Please Keep it Simple or Give chance to people for keeping it simple wich work with small team (maybe only 1 person)

Thanks and Reagards
Mehmet Kanpinar

@thiagolunardi
Copy link
Contributor Author

About WebAPI: The idea is to give a sample of how to use all Equinox approach for ones that want to avoid using MVC - I'm this kind, always using SPA + API solution.

About IdServer: That's a God's feeling the direction is going. Full responsibility segregation. Your business should try to avoid to know what a User is. Instead, the business knows what a Customer is. Also, my app should not be responsible for identification, the idea behind is, anyone using the app is already a known and identified person.

Take a look what's coming with netcore 2.0. They are really pushing to this direction. Nonetheless, nothing stops you to setup on same web project, your app and the IdServer settings - after IdServer is migrated to netcore 2.0, ofc. ;)

@CanMehmetK
Copy link

Is there any date for V3 ?

@EduardoPires
Copy link
Owner

We are using NetDevPack.Identity that works well, IDS 4 is not necessary and now is a paid service.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants