Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/testing #6

Merged
merged 14 commits into from Feb 17, 2022
Merged

Feature/testing #6

merged 14 commits into from Feb 17, 2022

Conversation

eduardosancho
Copy link
Owner

@eduardosancho eduardosancho commented Feb 16, 2022

What was done in this PR: 💣

  • Use Jest to test the functionality of the functions and if-statements inside calculate.js and operate.js. 👍

  • Use Jest snapshots to test the App.js component and Routes in its navbar. 🏃

  • Use React Testing Library (fireEvent) to simulate user interaction. 🤖

  • All tests pass ✔️

willy

@JohnFTitor JohnFTitor added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 16, 2022
@JohnFTitor JohnFTitor added this to the Testing milestone Feb 16, 2022
Copy link

@julie-ify julie-ify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @eduardosancho and @JohnFTitor,

Good job so far!

Highlight!

  • Good feature branch name ✔️
  • No linter errors ✔️
  • Descriptive pull request ✔️
  • Descriptive commit messages ✔️
  • Good code organization and working app ✔️
  • All tests are passing ✔️

Hello ✋, you have done well reaching this point of the milestone 🤝 . But there are some issues that you still need to work on to go to the next project but you are almost there!

Status: Required Changes ♻️⛔️

Check the comments under the review.

  • [REQUIRED] It would be good to add instructions on how to run the tests in the README by adding the command to run the test so that users can easily find all commands that are needed to run your app.

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix is not crucial enough to stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better.

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread and tag me @julie-ify if something is not 100% clear.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

Copy link

@Gambit142 Gambit142 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @eduardosancho 👋,

Your project is complete! There is nothing else to say other than... it's time to merge it :shipit:
Congratulations! 🎉

ApprovedAgreeGIF

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

@JohnFTitor JohnFTitor self-assigned this Feb 17, 2022
@JohnFTitor JohnFTitor merged commit ed30043 into development Feb 17, 2022
@eduardosancho eduardosancho deleted the feature/testing branch February 17, 2022 03:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants