You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we want #67 without a massive increase to the bundle size, it seems to me that the most reasonable way to go ahead is to make the feature opt-in by a switch in the settings. Then, we can dynamically load the module when enabling the feature in the client.
However, I don't know how the support for code splitting is in Gulp. I think it's a bit easier to do in wbepack using modules such as react-loadable, so this issue is basically for discussing whether we would want to consider moving to webpack or not. I think moving to something like create-react-app would be nice, however there is no support for Stylus in CRA. Writing a custom webpack configuration is certainly viable, though.
Is this something to consider?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we want #67 without a massive increase to the bundle size, it seems to me that the most reasonable way to go ahead is to make the feature opt-in by a switch in the settings. Then, we can dynamically load the module when enabling the feature in the client.
However, I don't know how the support for code splitting is in Gulp. I think it's a bit easier to do in wbepack using modules such as react-loadable, so this issue is basically for discussing whether we would want to consider moving to webpack or not. I think moving to something like
create-react-app
would be nice, however there is no support for Stylus in CRA. Writing a custom webpack configuration is certainly viable, though.Is this something to consider?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: