New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BD-2] BB-2365: Merge LTI 1.3 support to master. #82
[BD-2] BB-2365: Merge LTI 1.3 support to master. #82
Conversation
Features: Implement LTI 1.3 launch support. Add LTI 1.3 passthrough views as LMS plugins.
Features: Implement LTI 1.3 launch support. Add LTI 1.3 passthrough views as LMS plugins.
This commit adds support for the LTI 1.3 Access token endpoint, as detailed in the IMS Security Framework. The token is generated using the consumer's private key (stored in the XBlock) after validating the message sent by the LTI Tool using it's public key. Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cimolin da Silva <giovannicimolin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cimolin da Silva <giovannicimolin@gmail.com>
Also fixes a few untreated exceptions and remove unused variables. Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cimolin da Silva <giovannicimolin@gmail.com>
Thanks for the pull request, @giovannicimolin! I've created OSPR-4755 to keep track of it in JIRA, where we prioritize reviews. Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket:
All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here. Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green. |
k# Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
e217e3a
to
d020659
Compare
@giovannicimolin 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future. |
This PR merges the feature branch that implements LTI 1.3 launch support.
Already tested and approved by edX team on review branch.
Testing instructions:
Reviewers: