feat: tiny improvements for "convertValue" #5302
Conversation
We don't need to check each value's satisfication so when one meets, the loop can be broken.
WalkthroughThe recent update enhances the efficiency of the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- lib/core/utils.js (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (2)
lib/core/utils.js (2)
23-30: The optimization to break out of the loop early when a match is found in theignorekeys is a good improvement for efficiency. This change ensures that unnecessary iterations are avoided, which can be particularly beneficial when theignorelist is long or the match is found early in the list.However, it's important to ensure that this change does not alter the intended behavior of the function, especially in edge cases where multiple keys might match. Given the use of
break, the logic now stops at the first match, which aligns with the described optimization goal.
35-35: The consolidation of conditions for returning primitives and arrays into a single line simplifies the logic and makes the function more readable. This change effectively groups together similar return behaviors, which can aid in understanding the function's flow at a glance.It's crucial, however, to verify that this consolidation does not inadvertently change the behavior for any edge cases, especially since the original logic might have had separate conditions for a reason. Assuming the existing tests cover these scenarios and the PR has been confirmed to pass all tests, this change appears to be safe and beneficial.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5302 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.86% 99.86%
=======================================
Files 36 36
Lines 3619 3620 +1
Branches 520 519 -1
=======================================
+ Hits 3614 3615 +1
Misses 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
fengmk2
changed the title
[skip ci] ## [3.21.0](v3.20.0...v3.21.0) (2024-03-31) ### Features * tiny improvements for "convertValue" ([#5302](#5302)) ([794d7f3](794d7f3))
Due to eggjs#5302, AI has given me some suggestions and I've added more unit tests to make sure everything goes fine.
According to AI's suggestions at #5302, it seems there're some missing unit tests and here's the fix for it.
We don't need to check each value's satisfication so when one meets, the loop can be broken.
npm testpassesSummary by CodeRabbit
ignorekeys within utility functions.