Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong PIXm IG version mentionned in ITI-83/104 #103

Closed
msmock opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #141
Closed

Wrong PIXm IG version mentionned in ITI-83/104 #103

msmock opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #141
Assignees

Comments

@msmock
Copy link
Contributor

msmock commented Jan 4, 2024

The link to the PIXm profile leads to the latest version, while the label specifies v3.0.0.

@msmock msmock self-assigned this Jan 4, 2024
@msmock
Copy link
Contributor Author

msmock commented Jan 10, 2024

Original feedback from Quentin, but can't find the reference. Can you give me a hint where to look?

@qligier
Copy link
Collaborator

qligier commented Jan 10, 2024

From the text, I think it appears in https://build.fhir.org/ig/ehealthsuisse/ch-epr-mhealth/iti-83.html.
Sorry, I initially filled it in the wrong issue it seems.

Edit: also in https://build.fhir.org/ig/ehealthsuisse/ch-epr-mhealth/iti-104.html

@qligier qligier changed the title IUA reference to PIXm Wrong PIXm IG version mentionned in ITI-83 Jan 10, 2024
@qligier
Copy link
Collaborator

qligier commented Jan 10, 2024

The link points to the latest version (v3.0.3), the label says v3.0.0 and we import v3.0.2 in the IG, it is quite confusing.

@qligier qligier changed the title Wrong PIXm IG version mentionned in ITI-83 Wrong PIXm IG version mentionned in ITI-83/104 Jan 10, 2024
@oliveregger
Copy link
Collaborator

we should update pixm to 3.0.3
pdqm -> 2.4.0 (ci build 2.4.0), text has to be fixed, remove pixm reference
mhd -> 4.2.1. (ci-build 4.2.0)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants