Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TSS containers remain active when ElasTest stops. #6

Closed
LordWire opened this issue Apr 27, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

TSS containers remain active when ElasTest stops. #6

LordWire opened this issue Apr 27, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@LordWire
Copy link

Elastest version: dev (20180425). This was also noticed by @gtunon a long time ago but we just reproduced it.
Elastest mode: experimental
Tested TSS: EBS
OS: Fedora 27 / MacOS High Sierra (tested on both).

When a TJob starts a TSS internally and the TJob is never finished (e.g. killed/failed), this TSS is not stopped when ElasTest is stopped. As a result, in subsequent TJob executions new TSS containers are launched and the old ones are ignored. This ends up creating several different issues, but the more important one is that nightly gets filled with orphaned running containers during every code update.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Launch ElasTest in experimental mode.
  2. Create a TJob that will launch its own TSS (don't start a TSS from 'Support Services' menu). This is tested with EBS.
  3. Launch the TJob and stop it while it is executing. At this point, the TSS containers remain active.
  4. Stop ElasTest and run a docker ps. The TSS containers are still running.
  5. Restart ElasTest and repeat the procedure. When the TJob is re-executed, a new set of TSS images will be launched.

This is related to and will trigger #4 .

@gortazar
Copy link
Member

This is a bug we are aware of. Can you give it a try with the new 0.9.1 version?

Steps to update can be found in the Update section here.

@gortazar gortazar added the bug label May 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants