Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Rollups] Day selector should take in account the dateFormat:dow advanced setting #23998

Open
marius-dr opened this issue Oct 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Rollups Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more

Comments

@marius-dr
Copy link
Member

Kibana version: master

Browser version: All

Original install method (e.g. download page, yum, from source, etc.): source

Describe the bug:
In the day of the week selector for the Schedule, the list starts with Sunday, regardless of the setting done in the advanced settings which sets what day should weeks start on.

Expected behavior:
Changing the start day of the week should offset the list in the rollup scheduler page.

Screenshots (if relevant):
dayoftheweek

dateformatter

I understand that the setting is generally used by ES for week aggregations, but since it's already exposed to the user, he will expect his regional setting to be used across the board.

@marius-dr marius-dr added bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience :Management labels Oct 15, 2018
@timroes timroes added Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more and removed :Management DO NOT USE labels Nov 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Rollups Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants