Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Accessibility) Spatial references in documentation #55566

Closed
myasonik opened this issue Jan 22, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

(Accessibility) Spatial references in documentation #55566

myasonik opened this issue Jan 22, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@myasonik
Copy link
Contributor

Searching our docs for common spatial references like “above,” “below”, “left,” and “right” yields a bunch of results. Though some uses might be fine, no UI controls should be labelled in such a way that relies on these characteristics.

Relevant WCAG Criteria: 1.3.3 WCAG Criterion - Level A

Originally mentioned in #11534 (comment) by @nrichers

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-docs (Team:Docs)

@myasonik myasonik changed the title (Accessibility) Spaction references in documentation (Accessibility) Spactial references in documentation Jan 22, 2020
@myasonik myasonik changed the title (Accessibility) Spactial references in documentation (Accessibility) Spatial references in documentation Jan 22, 2020
@myasonik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another way that we could improve our docs as well is removing mouse-specific verbiage (stuff like "Click on Discover" can become something like "Choose Discover").

Searching our docs for the word "click" shows about 3500 results in our docs alone so I'm not sure how to best tackle that.

More notes on writing for accessibility in Standards for Writing Accessibly

@myasonik
Copy link
Contributor Author

myasonik commented Mar 9, 2020

Thanks for the fix @KOTungseth!

I went through the PR and only saw fixes for "above" references and it looks like "left", "right" and "below" still exist throughout the docs.

Should I make separate tickets?

@KOTungseth
Copy link
Contributor

@myasonik this issue was closed by mistake. We'll be working on "left", "right" and "below" in the next few weeks. PRs to come!

@myasonik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should this stay open for "left" and "below" or should we open up new issues for those?

@gchaps
Copy link
Contributor

gchaps commented Apr 15, 2020

Already done:

Below: #60159

Left: #60807

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants