Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for force merge action to ILM policy form's hot phase #76211

Closed
cjcenizal opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Add support for force merge action to ILM policy form's hot phase #76211

cjcenizal opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:ILM Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more

Comments

@cjcenizal
Copy link
Contributor

Per the force merge docs page, force merge is available in both the hot and warm phases. Our UI needs to be updated to support this action.

Note the following conditions:

To use the forcemerge action in the hot phase, the rollover action must be present. If no rollover action is configured, ILM will reject the policy.

We need to add logic to hide the forcemerge action if rollover isn't enabled.

@cjcenizal cjcenizal added enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:ILM Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more labels Aug 27, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/es-ui (Team:Elasticsearch UI)

@cjcenizal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Related to elastic/elasticsearch#61666

@yuliacech
Copy link
Contributor

Closed via #77193.
Duplicate of #57642.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:ILM Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants