Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: expose native bindings by process type #36141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

fix: expose native bindings by process type #36141

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2023

Conversation

miniak
Copy link
Contributor

@miniak miniak commented Oct 26, 2022 •
edited by codebytere

Backport of #35949

Notes: none

@electron-cation electron-cation bot added the new-pr 🌱 PR opened in the last 24 hours label Oct 26, 2022
@trop trop bot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2022
Merged
4 tasks
@trop trop bot added 21-x-y backport This is a backport PR semver/patch backwards-compatible bug fixes labels Oct 26, 2022
@electron-cation electron-cation bot removed the new-pr 🌱 PR opened in the last 24 hours label Oct 26, 2022
@miniak miniak marked this pull request as draft October 30, 2022 12:20
@miniak miniak force-pushed the miniak/process-type-bindings-21-x-y branch from 0b01c06 to 915ba05 Compare February 7, 2023 22:50
@miniak miniak marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2023 01:38
@codebytere codebytere merged commit 2a9691f into 21-x-y Feb 8, 2023
@codebytere codebytere deleted the miniak/process-type-bindings-21-x-y branch February 8, 2023 13:57
@release-clerk
Copy link

release-clerk bot commented Feb 8, 2023

No Release Notes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@codebytere codebytere codebytere approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
21-x-y backport This is a backport PR semver/patch backwards-compatible bug fixes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@miniak @codebytere