Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

accepting an invite shouldn't move the focus to the room's new position in the room list #20211

Open
AmandineLP opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
A11y A-Invite A-Room-List O-Occasional Affects or can be seen by some users regularly or most users rarely S-Minor Impairs non-critical functionality or suitable workarounds exist T-Defect X-Needs-Design

Comments

@AmandineLP
Copy link
Contributor

if my room list is ordered by unread notifications and I accept an invite, the focus of the room list drops to the first unread room. It is very uncomfortable when you have a lot of unread rooms as then you have to scroll all the way back up to go back to the top of your list and there is no easy way to do so (try to grab the scroller to move it up 300 rooms is painful, and the other option is 3 clicks on the rooms label, then People label then favourite). This problem could also be fixed by a 'back to the top' button, but given the focus doesn't move when I read a room in the room list it just feels more natural that it shouldn't move here neither.

@SimonBrandner SimonBrandner added A-Invite A-Room-List A11y O-Occasional Affects or can be seen by some users regularly or most users rarely T-Defect S-Minor Impairs non-critical functionality or suitable workarounds exist labels Dec 18, 2021
@t3chguy
Copy link
Member

t3chguy commented Apr 25, 2023

this is done for accessibility, to keep your active element in view

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A11y A-Invite A-Room-List O-Occasional Affects or can be seen by some users regularly or most users rarely S-Minor Impairs non-critical functionality or suitable workarounds exist T-Defect X-Needs-Design
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants