Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate the publishing plugins #742

Closed
7 tasks
tintou opened this issue May 25, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #746
Closed
7 tasks

Evaluate the publishing plugins #742

tintou opened this issue May 25, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #746

Comments

@tintou
Copy link
Member

tintou commented May 25, 2023

Are they still working?

In pantheon-photos-publishing:

  • FacebookPublishing
  • PiwigoPublishing
  • FlickrPublishing
  • PicasaPublishing
  • YouTubePublishing

In pantheon-photos-publishing-extras:

  • TumblrPublishing
  • YandexPublishing
@davidmhewitt
Copy link
Member

You're thinking about the same thing as me 😅

I was just looking how hard it would be to port all of this to Soup 3, and it's not a small amount of work. But it might not be worth the effort if none of these plugins are working because the APIs changed.

However, if we want to reduce the amount of work:

  • Picasa doesn't exist anymore so that can be deleted.
  • YouTube is surely only for publishing videos, which seems like a really niche feature for a photo manager, so I vote that's deleted too?

@davidmhewitt
Copy link
Member

It's actually really easy and satisfying to delete all of these and remove the Dependency on Soup altogether 🤣

@tintou
Copy link
Member Author

tintou commented May 25, 2023

I also believe that the Facebook one isn't working because the API key is unlikely to be still valid and… it's untouched since a decade

@tintou
Copy link
Member Author

tintou commented May 25, 2023

The last significant update is 447e28a from 2016 🙃

@danirabbit
Copy link
Member

I'm on team delete them all 😬

@zeebok
Copy link
Contributor

zeebok commented May 31, 2023

  • YouTube is surely only for publishing videos, which seems like a really niche feature for a photo manager, so I vote that's deleted too?

I think this would depend on keeping video file support in Photos. I have seen some people say to keep it though I really question the benefit it provides.

@zeebok
Copy link
Contributor

zeebok commented May 31, 2023

I'm on team delete them all grimacing

That or perhaps they need to a rewrite from scratch for up-to-date places. Flickr is owned by SmugMug now and they may have public APIs but I dunno what kind of percentage of users this would benefit though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants