Reference to Module.record.field is treated as reference to field in module Module.record.

[marick]

Given Module.elm containing this:

-- ...
nameFilterLens =
  { get = .nameFilter
  , set = \ p w -> { w | nameFilter = p }
  }

... and Update.elm containing this:

import Model as Model exposing (Model)

useLens : Model -> String
useLens model =
  Model.nameFilterLens.get model      --- <<< THIS LINE FAILS TO COMPILE

... I get this compiler message:

790 $ elm-make Update.elm
-- NAMING ERROR ----------------------------------------------------- Update.elm

Cannot find variable `Model.nameFilterLens.get`.

7|   Model.nameFilterLens.get model
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No module called `Model.nameFilterLens` has been imported. 

I was hoping that, since nameFilterLens is not capitalized, it wouldn't be taken as being part of a module name.

Full source is attached, with .elm extension changed to .txt to make Github happy.

Elm version is elm-make 0.18 (Elm Platform 0.18.0). OSX El Capitan 10.11.6

Model.txt
Update.txt

[process-bot]

Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

[jvoigtlaender]

Duplicate of #1549, isn't it?

[marick]

Yes, I think. Sorry. Should I close?

[jvoigtlaender]

Yes, I think so.