Tell users what they need in addition to use elm-repl #115
Comments
One of the other places from where people might need to be linked to a collection of " |
Refining this:
|
@jvoigtlaender as an Elm newcomer who installed via Homepage → Install → npm installer, I confirm that I didn't hear about The workaround mentioned by #113 (comment) ( Running Arch Linux, and Elm 0.16.0 on node 5.4.1 + npm 3.5.3 (official packages). |
Thank you @ronjouch for the solution, because not even google had helped 😸 |
@ronjouch thank you. |
I am reading this as, we need to tell people to install |
Actually, people usually needed |
When I build, I believe the |
@ronjouch wow you just saved me a lot of internet searching. |
If anyone drops by later: On Fedora 27, with node v10.0.0 (compiled from source) and elm 0.18.0, Shared library I don't know why |
People installing Elm stuff by following the directions from the README here will not currently learn about the fact that they need node.js in order to use
elm-repl
.Probably:
In addition to being told about node.js, they might also need to be told about other things (like this: #113 (comment)). So it makes sense to collect such information in only one place, but then link to that place from another place (or places).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: