You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current implementation isn't compliant to Conformance tests:
Conformance test was runned with sonobuoy:
$ sonobuoy run --mode certified-conformance --wait
Results were:
[It] [sig-api-machinery] AdmissionWebhook [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] should mutate configmap [Conformance]
[It] [sig-network] HostPort validates that there is no conflict between pods with same hostPort but different hostIP and protocol [LinuxOnly] [Conformance]
[It] [sig-api-machinery] Aggregator Should be able to support the 1.17 Sample API Server using the current Aggregator [Conformance]
[It] [sig-api-machinery] AdmissionWebhook [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] should be able to deny custom resource creation, update and deletion [Conformance]
At this time only:
[It] [sig-api-machinery] AdmissionWebhook [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] should be able to deny custom resource creation, update and deletion [Conformance]
[It] [sig-api-machinery] AdmissionWebhook [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] should mutate configmap [Conformance]
[It] [sig-network] HostPort validates that there is no conflict between pods with same hostPort but different hostIP and protocol [LinuxOnly] [Conformance]
[It] [sig-api-machinery] Aggregator Should be able to support the 1.17 Sample API Server using the current Aggregator [Conformance]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Why is it important ? The test [It] [sig-network] HostPort validates that there is no conflict between pods with same hostPort but different hostIP and protocol [LinuxOnly] [Conformance] deploy 3 pods:
On Node 1, Ip 127.0.0.1 with nodeport 54323 Protocol TCP
On Node 1, Ip with nodeport 54323 Protocol TCP
On Node 1, Ip with nodeport 54323 Protocol UDP
This test check if there is no conflicts if two pod share the same hostport, with different protocol and/or ip. With current implementation of Cilium full kube-proxy replacement this test failes.
Current workaround:
Deploy Cilium along side kube-proxy.
Deploy Cilium with portmap plugin enabled in chaining mode.
Current implementation isn't compliant to Conformance tests:
Conformance test was runned with sonobuoy:
Results were:
At this time only:
has been treated by c9b1589
Still failing tests:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: