-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unequal number of tests in each partition #60
Comments
Partitioning is currently done by file, or, more accurately, by AMD module. Ideally, you are correct and partitioning would be done at the test level, but this is currently not possible as once a In the future, I think this could be possible if the partitioning logic is pushed upstream into QUnit itself, but this is a long way off and likely not to be completed any time in the near future. I think a note about this in the |
We see So far, we have no idea how to debug the memory leak. I'm looking into ways of working around it. An obvious way would be to split the test into many partitions, but it doesn't help. Regardless of the amount of partitions (I tried Also, Please advise. |
I just ran It looks like splitting doesn't work at all, please help. |
We're running Ember CLI 2.15. |
I had the same issue today. In testem.js I had |
@lolmaus it sounds like you have several distinct issues. It would be tremendously helpful if you could (1) open new issues for each distinct issue you are experiencing (as they don't seem to be related to this issue), and (2) provide some form of a reproduction. Thanks! |
@trentmwillis Here you go: #108. |
We are using the split option, however we find that the number of tests executed in each partition varies greatly. Does the splitting happen on the basis of number of tests or the number of the corresponding files? If it's the latter, it represents a problem for us since we have some files that contain a large number of tests and some which contain 2 or 3. We could still refactor our tests and create more number of files containing fewer test cases, but logically, shouldn't partitioning be done on the number of test cases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: