Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

beta4: Why do have hasMeasuredUncertainty and hasQuantity different perspectives? #207

Closed
MBueschelberger opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

beta4: Why do have hasMeasuredUncertainty and hasQuantity different perspectives? #207

MBueschelberger opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@MBueschelberger
Copy link

Dear EMMOers,

Concerning beta4, I was wondering why hasMeasuredUncertainty is considered to a semiotical relationship and why hasQuantity is a holistic relationship.

Is it because a measurement is considered to be a stongly semiotic process and assigning a quantity to another entity not?

Would be really looking forward to your answer!
@jesper-friis
Copy link
Contributor

Things might have changed since you created this issue. There should be difference. hasMeasuredUncertainty is a subproperty of hasQuantity. Both relations are defined in metrology, which depends on both holistic and semiotics.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jesper-friis @MBueschelberger