Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

6.0.0-preview-4 - unable to set /Metadata at /Catalog level #42

Open
podprad opened this issue Oct 16, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

6.0.0-preview-4 - unable to set /Metadata at /Catalog level #42

podprad opened this issue Oct 16, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@podprad
Copy link

podprad commented Oct 16, 2023

Hi,

In 6.0.0-preview-4 I'm unable to set XMP metadata.
I add own /Metadata dictionary, it's written to the output PDF, but finally PdfSharp links own indirect object:

1 0 obj
<<
/Type/Catalog
/Pages 2 0 R
/Metadata 9 0 R
>>
endobj
...
8 0 obj
<<
/Length 340
/Type/Metadata
/Subtype/XML
>>
stream
<?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>
<x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 6.1.10">
  <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <rdf:Description rdf:about=""
        xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/"
      xmp:CreatorTool="Test"/>
  </rdf:RDF>
</x:xmpmeta>
endstream
endobj
...
9 0 obj
<<
/Type/Metadata
/Subtype/XML
/Length 1469
>>
stream
<?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>
  <x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="3.1-701">
    <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:pdf="http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/">
        <pdf:Producer>PDFsharp 6.0.0-preview-4 under Microsoft Windows 10.0.19045</pdf:Producer><pdf:Keywords></pdf:Keywords>
      </rdf:Description>
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <dc:title><rdf:Alt><rdf:li xml:lang="x-default"></rdf:li></rdf:Alt></dc:title>
        <dc:creator><rdf:Seq><rdf:li></rdf:li></rdf:Seq></dc:creator>
        <dc:description><rdf:Alt><rdf:li xml:lang="x-default"></rdf:li></rdf:Alt></dc:description>
      </rdf:Description>
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/">
        <xmp:CreatorTool>PDFsharp 6.0.0-preview-4 (www.pdfsharp.net)</xmp:CreatorTool>
        <xmp:CreateDate>0001-01-01T00:00:00.0000000</xmp:CreateDate>
        <xmp:ModifyDate>0001-01-01T00:00:00.0000000</xmp:ModifyDate>
      </rdf:Description>
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:xmpMM="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/">
        <xmpMM:DocumentID>uuid:cd4cf696-81b0-4f4a-8296-ad24a0482084</xmpMM:DocumentID>
        <xmpMM:InstanceID>uuid:97a97879-905c-4417-86f7-8ac6a426854a</xmpMM:InstanceID>
      </rdf:Description>
    </rdf:RDF>
  </x:xmpmeta>
<?xpacket end="w"?>                
endstream
endobj

In 1.50.5147 it was possible.

Here is the source code allowing to reproduce the issue:
https://github.com/podprad/misc_public/tree/main/playgrounds/csharp/PDFSharpMetaIssue

Pasted code:

<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">

    <PropertyGroup>
        <OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
        
        <TargetFramework>net6.0</TargetFramework>
<!--        <TargetFramework>net48</TargetFramework>-->
    </PropertyGroup>

    <ItemGroup>
      <None Remove="Pdf14Simplest.pdf" />
      <Content Include="Pdf14Simplest.pdf">
        <CopyToOutputDirectory>PreserveNewest</CopyToOutputDirectory>
      </Content>
    </ItemGroup>

    <ItemGroup>
      <PackageReference Include="PDFsharp" Version="6.0.0-preview-4" Condition="'$(TargetFramework)' == 'net6.0'"/>
      <PackageReference Include="PDFsharp" Version="1.50.5147" Condition="'$(TargetFramework)' == 'net48'"/>
    </ItemGroup>

</Project>
namespace PDFSharpMetaIssue
{
    using System.Text;
    using PdfSharp.Pdf;
    using PdfSharp.Pdf.Advanced;

    public static class Program
    {
        public static void Main()
        {
            const string XmpToSet = @"<?xpacket begin="""" id=""W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d""?>
<x:xmpmeta xmlns:x=""adobe:ns:meta/"" x:xmptk=""Adobe XMP Core 6.1.10"">
  <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=""http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"">
    <rdf:Description rdf:about=""""
        xmlns:xmp=""http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/""
      xmp:CreatorTool=""Test""/>
  </rdf:RDF>
</x:xmpmeta>";

            var xmpBytes = new UTF8Encoding(false).GetBytes(XmpToSet);

            var filePath = "Pdf14Simplest.pdf";

            using (var document = PdfSharp.Pdf.IO.PdfReader.Open(filePath))
            {
                var catalog = document.Internals.Catalog;

                if (catalog.Elements.TryGetValue("/Metadata", out var oldMetadata))
                {
                    if (oldMetadata is PdfReference oldMetadataReference)
                    {
                        catalog.Elements.Remove("/Metadata");
                        document.Internals.RemoveObject(oldMetadataReference.Value);
                    }
                }

                var newMetadata = new PdfDictionary();
                newMetadata.CreateStream(xmpBytes);
                newMetadata.Elements.Add("/Type", new PdfName("/Metadata"));
                newMetadata.Elements.Add("/Subtype", new PdfName("/XML"));

                document.Internals.AddObject(newMetadata);

                catalog.Elements.Add("/Metadata", newMetadata.Reference);

                document.Save("Output.pdf");
            }
        }
    }
}
@ThomasHoevel ThomasHoevel added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 16, 2023
@julienrffr
Copy link

Hi,

I've just fixed this issue in pull request #44

PdfSharp was simply setting its own new /Metadata object, not taking into account any already existing one that would be set.

@julienrffr
Copy link

I've updated my fix, making the behavior depend on a document option (it gives more control).
See details in pull request.

@podprad
Copy link
Author

podprad commented Oct 16, 2023

Thank you for analysing it and your time.

I added a comment directly in PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants