You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I gave it some more thoughts, and tested with some examples to confirm my guesses: It is already possible! As empymod does not make any assumption (not even of an air layer), it is completely agnostic to the direction of the z-axis, as long as depths are increasing. So
The result is exactly the same. So empymod works for positive z downwards AND upwards, which is great news!
There are two differences to keep in mind:
src/rec on a boundary: It is always taken to be in the layer towards the next lower interface, which is a different one depending on z upwards or downwards. To avoid confusion, put it a little bit into the layer. In the above example, if, e.g., rec_z=+/-300, it will be taken to be in the water layer if z is positive downwards, but in the subsurface if z is positive upwards. If you set rec_z=+/-299.99 it will be in the water layer in both cases.
dip becomes -dip by switching from one to the other convention. azimuth remains the same. If positions are defined as [x1, x2, y1, y2, z1, z2] then it remains the same too.
Change empymod from positive z downwards to positive z upwards, to be compatible with emg3d and most 'modern' geo-software and display tools.Backwards incompatible, something for version 2.0.See comment below, it is already possible. We just have to document it better:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: