New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tune scanning mechanics (time and range) to make avoiding scans more challenging #1962
Comments
still, it'd be weird if 2 independent scanners scan & speed up because they both scan |
Well I imagine that the two ships would communicate with each other that they are both scanning the same ship, and therefore they each scan different parts so that they can get the scan done faster, so I don't see how that's weird.
Stacking scanners on the same ship already decreases scan time and increases range, so better scanners wouldn't need to be made. |
then maybe adding an extra one to the gunboats if they have room? most AI ship variants have empty space |
That's what I suggested in the other thread where this came up. I think if some of them had one and some of them had two it would strike the proper balance. But that's alot more work of course. |
I think I prefer the 'some have two' idea. Your point about them stacking on the same ship makes sense, my main concern is that getting ships talking to each other like that might be a pretty hefty investment of time for something that could be solved a more simple way. |
If we go with the double-up-on-scanners idea, I'll just add that into the PR. |
Word. So the only question is how many should have two scanners? Do you think a 50% chance to get fast scanned would set the risk reward at an appropriate level? |
Nice |
a few things on the scanning : (not sure I should add this there, or make a new issue) pressing the "trust" key, made the "fine" window disappear immediately in a few milliseconds. |
Just a heads up, I originally made this issue before I'd realized that ships would never finish scanning, so I will have to revisit the pirate jobs to see if scanning is good as is now. |
I've been testing the scanning in order to see how it is right now. With an acceleration of 170 and turn of 121 (using the biggest atomic engines the Mod Argosy could fit, prioritizing turn over thrust, but keeping all other outfits default), I was unable to run from scans assuming they got on me as soon as I entered the system, or shortly after. I then stripped the Argosy down to the bear minimum, using only a power source (NT-200), a Hyperdrive, a supercapacitor, and the engines. This boosted my stats to 175 turn and 240 acceleration, but even at this speed I would still be scanned if instantly locked on to. I then switched from trying to go high turn/acceleration to using a Scram Drive (great for straight systems) with the default Mod Argosy engines (60 turn, 112 acceleration), and no matter how fast ships seemed to get a scan lock on me, they were unable to scan me assuming I was just passing through the system, but as soon as you try and come in for a landing, if there is any ship with a scanner nearby then you're getting scanned. I then tested the Scram Drive in one of its weaker areas: systems with tight angles. With 170 turn and 234 acceleration, I traveled between Vega, Sol, and Altair over and over again, and on tight angles like this you'll get scanned. So as it is, barring the use of interference plating, the only way you're ever going to be able to avoid scans is if you're using a Scram Drive and the systems you're going through are all pretty straight, or at least there are no wide angled turns. The wider the angle, the faster your ship needs to be. And then you have to hope that you aren't going to get scanned as you land. Hey, interference plating will be useful now. |
jump drive will work though. but it makes it hard on longer distance since you have to land and gather fuel more often. seems balanced to me. |
just note that a jump drive isn't as easy to get |
Given that I originally made this issue when scanning was broken and things seem fine now, I'll close this. Avoiding scans is very challenging without interference plating, so someone taking lots of pirate jobs is going to need to spare some outit space for interference plating if they don't want to get fined. |
As far as I can tell right now, if two ships scan you at once then they each independently scan you with their own scan times. Even with pretty weak engines, you're still able to warp out of systems before being scanned with illegal cargo. Maybe when multiple ships scan you at once, their scans should combine and the time should be reduced somewhat (not as much as if one ship had multiple scanners, though).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: