Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potentially improve the interface to GegenbauerPolynomial #747

Open
3 tasks
dvandyk opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks

Potentially improve the interface to GegenbauerPolynomial #747

dvandyk opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@dvandyk
Copy link
Member

dvandyk commented Dec 3, 2023

Adapt GegenbauerPolynomial:

  • check if the exponent alpha can be made constexpr
  • check if we can template the class with respect to the order parameter.
  • adjust all usages of GegenbauerPolynomial in the code.
@dvandyk dvandyk added this to the Release 1.1 milestone Dec 3, 2023
@dvandyk dvandyk self-assigned this Jan 2, 2024
@dvandyk
Copy link
Member Author

dvandyk commented Jan 4, 2024

  • check if the exponent alpha can be made constexpr
  • check if we can template the class with respect to the order parameter.

Both of these should be possible, since as off C++20 non-type template parameter types can be of floating point type!

@dvandyk dvandyk changed the title Switch to using static polynomial objects where possible Potentially improve the interface to GegenbauerPolynomial Jan 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant