-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Specialty hospitals - should they be included? #16
Comments
Good point, thanks Rob. Yes, I think you're right that the numbers are pretty small, especially given that the mapping is only based on admissions until the end of September 2020, plus the step where we exclude Trust-LTLA pairs with fewer than 10 will exacerbate this. What is your concern with including these centres - that the mapping isn't very representative (which I agree on), or that including them will impact other Trusts' mappings? x trust_code trust_name geo_code geo_name p_trust p_geo What do you think? |
So I guess the worst one is that every patient in the Royal Papworth is from Huntingdonshire, and 10% of patients in Huntingdonshire end up at the Royal Papworth which doesn't feel representative. Having said that I agree in most applications I should think it won't make a massive difference. |
trust_code name
1 RBS Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
2 RBV The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
3 RGM Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
4 RQ3 Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
5 RT3 Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
I notice a few hospitals in your mapping that are essentially specialist centres for specific conditions and would in theory take patients from all over the country. Some of them have a p_trust of 1 which I am surprised at as I'd have expected them to have a very broad geographical coverage - maybe a small numbers thing. I suspect the covid patients in these hospitals are incidental rather than admitted because of COVID, and I wonder if it would be better to exclude these 5 trusts before running the mapping.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: