You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It may be the case that you want to present a different set of options for a field based on the values already set for an existing field (e.g. an eprint's type). At the moment this cannot be done. However, as subject fields can set set their top to a function (#249) it should be possible to do something similar for set_name
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is a potential for this to break or at least make the output from /cgi/schema inaccurate. I would advise that if such a function is used the default return value should be one that encompasses all possible options.
It does mean you need to define a separate set of phrases for licenses_for_article. You should probably do something like the following to make sure license typename phrases are consistent:
You need not for the licence description phrases (e.g. licenses_for_article_description_cc_by_nd_4) as it will not know what namedset was used it will just assume the one in the field configuration, so it is important that those license description phrases are present.
It may be the case that you want to present a different set of options for a field based on the values already set for an existing field (e.g. an eprint's
type
). At the moment this cannot be done. However, as subject fields can set set their top to a function (#249) it should be possible to do something similar forset_name
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: