You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems both functions don't work or I'm doing it wrong:
Serial.println(sms.deleteAll()); and I see a 0 in the serial monitor.
If I delete an SMS using sms.deleteOne(idx); I get a 1 if the SMS with index exists.
While testing this lib I had received 2 SMS but their index was 21 and 22.
What about 0 to 20?
Before switching to this lib I was using just serial communication to do some tests with the SIM800L.
I already had received 2 more SMS before switching, but I don't see them with this lib.
Could it be that the lib uses a different memory location on the module compared to using a new module with just serial com?
Best regards,
Robert
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @ROdoka , When I was using this library I encountered the same issue. You can fix it with this code instead of deleteAll() function : sms.sendATCommand("AT+CMGDA=\"DEL ALL\"");
It seems both functions don't work or I'm doing it wrong:
Serial.println(sms.deleteAll()); and I see a 0 in the serial monitor.
If I delete an SMS using sms.deleteOne(idx); I get a 1 if the SMS with index exists.
While testing this lib I had received 2 SMS but their index was 21 and 22.
What about 0 to 20?
Before switching to this lib I was using just serial communication to do some tests with the SIM800L.
I already had received 2 more SMS before switching, but I don't see them with this lib.
Could it be that the lib uses a different memory location on the module compared to using a new module with just serial com?
Best regards,
Robert
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: