Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polytomous Missing Values Handling #30

Closed
eribean opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #82
Closed

Polytomous Missing Values Handling #30

eribean opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #82
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@eribean
Copy link
Owner

eribean commented Mar 19, 2020

Allow missing values in polytomous datasets for parameter estimation.

@eribean eribean added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 19, 2020
@eribean eribean added this to To do in May Release Board via automation Apr 13, 2020
@eribean
Copy link
Owner Author

eribean commented Dec 6, 2020

Once this is added, get rid of twopl_mml and replace with a call to grm_mml. It's faster and less code to maintain.

@eribean eribean self-assigned this Dec 7, 2020
@eribean
Copy link
Owner Author

eribean commented Dec 26, 2020

Started working on this, going to remove code from twopl_mml once implemented.

@eribean
Copy link
Owner Author

eribean commented Dec 27, 2020

Working with minimal changes. Propogated to GRM/ PCM / GUM. Dichotomous models already have it. Need to add to Joint maximum likelihood algorithms too and update unittests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant