Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse tables without header #301

Open
MWWorks opened this issue Mar 25, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

Parse tables without header #301

MWWorks opened this issue Mar 25, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@MWWorks
Copy link

MWWorks commented Mar 25, 2015

A table header seems required to trigger table parsing. This post suggests that ParseDown Extra supports it, but it doesn't seem to? Admittedly it doesn't seem to be part of the Markdown Extra spec - it would be handy, though.

@erusev
Copy link
Owner

erusev commented Mar 25, 2015

It does seem like it might be handy. I'll think about it, but I can give no promises.

@MWWorks
Copy link
Author

MWWorks commented Mar 25, 2015

No promises required! Many thanks for what is a super-awesome tool as is; purely just a suggestion if it proves opportune :)

@schriftgestalt
Copy link

I would like to have that option, too.

@martindilling
Copy link

Yea tables without headers would be very useful :)

@nothotscott
Copy link

Saw that post too. Was sad to see it doesn't

@elusiveity
Copy link

Hello there
I also wouldn't mind being able to specify tables without headers. Sometimes they come in handy!

--------- | :-------------------:
Page Name | <!nput type='text' />

@Himra
Copy link

Himra commented Aug 30, 2019

Is this feature plant in future releases

@aidantwoods
Copy link
Collaborator

aidantwoods commented Aug 30, 2019

There's a PR open for this (#580).

GitHub flavoured markdown actually already has a concept of bodyless tables (i.e. neither body rows, nor <tbody> is generated). If possible it would be good to get headerless tables standardised there too, I opened a spec issue (github/cmark-gfm#91) but unfortunately I'm not sure how active the spec repo is any more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants