docs: Improve ignores documentation
#17239
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 task
mdjermanovic
added
the
accepted
1 task
|
Rabsed on top of 788d836 (docs: add references to MIT License). |
fasttime
force-pushed
the
docs-improve-ignores
branch
from
a5bca46
to
e4a31db
Compare
mdjermanovic
reviewed
Jun 8, 2023
Clarifiy a sentence Co-authored-by: Milos Djermanovic <milos.djermanovic@gmail.com>
eslint-github-bot
bot
added
the
archived due to age
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)
[x] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofix to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
This PR corrects the
ignoresoption documentation as suggested here and here and in the 2023-06-01 TSC Meeting.Fixes #17213
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?