indent split argument functions

[kentcdodds]

When my function signature gets long (I realize this is an anti-pattern, but we're working on that), I get some odd indent warnings:

Here's the code (for copy/paste):

index.js (this is how lots of my code looks like today)

function foo(bar, baz,
             eggs, spam) {
  bar(eggs, baz, spam);
}

foo();

index.passes.js

function foo(bar, baz,
             eggs, spam) {
               bar(eggs, baz, spam); // <-- this is kinda crazy
             } // <-- crazy

foo();

.eslintrc

{
  "rules": {
    "indent": [2, 2]
  }
}

Is there anything I can do to tell ESLint to not care about the fact that the arguments are on multiple lines? Or could I somehow have my arguments on multiple lines in a different way to make it so I still get the indentation of 2?

[eslintbot]

Thanks for the issue! We get a lot of issues, so this message is automatically posted to each one to help you check that you've included all of the information we need to help you.

Reporting a bug? Please be sure to include:

1. The version of ESLint you are using (run eslint -v)
2. The source code that caused the problem
3. The configuration you're using (for the rule or your entire config file)
4. The actual ESLint output complete with line numbers

Requesting a new rule? Please be sure to include:

1. The use case for the rule - what is it trying to prevent or flag?
2. Whether the rule is trying to prevent an error or is purely stylistic
3. Why you believe this rule is generic enough to be included

Requesting a feature? Please be sure to include:

1. The problem you want to solve (don't mention the solution)
2. Your take on the correct solution to problem

Including this information in your issue helps us to triage it and get you a response as quickly as possible.

Thanks!

[BYK]

This should be fixed with #3467 - just not released yet.

[kentcdodds]

Found an answer:

function foo(bar, baz,
             eggs, spam
) {
  bar(eggs, baz, spam);
}

foo();

This is sufficient... Now I just need to refactor a bunch of code :-)

[BYK]

Now I just need to refactor a bunch of code :-)

Or you can wait for the upcoming release ;)

[kentcdodds]

Whoops, race condition with you @BYK. Thanks! Any word on when that next release will be? (As an open source author myself, I'm sorry to be asking that question).

[BYK]

@kentcdodds - Heh, no problem. Release is a @nzakas question though :)