-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/python', '-m', 'pip', 'install', '--user', 'virtualenv']' returned non-zero exit status 1. (IDFGH-11154) #12321
Comments
did fix this, but i am unsure if this is the right mehthod to handle this. Thanks, |
I experienced the same issue today with esp-idf v4.4. |
Agree. i have here a Project which uses MCPWM, and this Peripherial only runs stable in 4.2.5 or earlier. Therfore i needed to install 4.2.5 i absolutely share your Opinion that EOL ESP-IDF should not be used anymore. |
Yes, that is the correct way. You haven't mentioned the OS you are using but since you mentioned Earlier versions used to install more packages by default and packages had more strict dependencies. |
One nice tip for using old ESP-IDF releases is with docker. Older versions, such as v4.2.5, can be found as well. With docker one doesn't have to bother to install and set up everything. (Thanks for the tip @DNedic!) |
Answers checklist.
IDF version.
esp-idf-v4.2.5
Operating System used.
Linux
How did you build your project?
Command line with idf.py
If you are using Windows, please specify command line type.
None
What is the expected behavior?
I expected it to run the installation if i call
:~/esp-idf-v4.2.5$ ./install.sh all
What is the actual behavior?
Instead it give a Error Message
Steps to reproduce.
...
Build or installation Logs.
More Information.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: