Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #8 - Agenda #16

Closed
DBrettRobertson opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 8 comments
Closed

Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #8 - Agenda #16

DBrettRobertson opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@DBrettRobertson
Copy link
Contributor

DBrettRobertson commented Mar 12, 2019

Date and Time

Proposed time is 14:00 UTC on Tuesday, March 26th, 2019.

Location

Zoom: The link will be posted in the Gitter channel and sent to attendees.
YouTube Livestream Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLR5V0DGZxE

Agenda

  1. Update on ProgPow Audit

    • Hudson to give update
    • Subcommittee update
    • When are we shutting down progpowcarbonvote.com? Need to announce that now
  2. Hard Fork Coordination Update

  3. Process Management

  4. Moloch DAO & Aragon Review

  5. Updates on the action items from Constantinople post-mortem

  6. Update on the Ethereum Development Portal designs/structure

  7. Community Outreach

  8. Replacing Afri as multisig keyholder

  9. Eth2 coordination help

  10. Ethereum.org website update

  11. Communicating about all core devs

  12. Any Other Business

  13. Review of Actions from Meeting 7

    • ACTION 6.3: ProgPoW subcommitte to review feedback from stakeholders to see if anything should be included in technical audit.
    • ACTION 6.4: Joseph to post the updated communications checklist to the ECH internal gitter channel.
    • ACTION 6.7: Hugo & Joseph to work together to write up a general overview of how Moloch DAO might benefit the Ethereum Community.
    • ACTION 7.1: Identify if the new Gitcoin grant was for the Whiteblock audit
    • ACTION 7.2: Tim Beiko: Add comment to the All Core Devs Agenda regarding tentatively adding the ProgPoW EIP into Instanbul pending audit. Lane to assist with making it an agenda item.
    • ACTION 7.3: Hudson to provide feedback on Hard Fork Coordinator/s.
    • ACTION 7.4: Pooja to manage. Cat Herders to review Pooja's initial master document to manage process flow and start to build this process - here.
    • ACTION 7.5: Cat Herders to look the Handbook proposed by Luke Schoen and discuss over the next couple weeks - here.
  14. Next Meeting

@lrettig
Copy link
Member

lrettig commented Mar 12, 2019

Could we discuss nominating a third multisig keyholder to replace Afri?

@Mikerah
Copy link

Mikerah commented Mar 17, 2019

Hi,

I'm not sure if it's too late to add this to the agenda but I would like to see more collaboration between ECH and ETH2.0. As an ETH2.0 implementer, there is a lot to be determined and planned out that still hasn't been decided on yet. Some of us are doing this by self-organizing. However, I think it would be better to enlist the help of the ECH and better communicate ETH2.0 to the wider community with regards to project management in ETH2.0.

@lrettig
Copy link
Member

lrettig commented Mar 17, 2019 via email

@Mikerah
Copy link

Mikerah commented Mar 19, 2019

The main task that comes to mind is for organizing a cross-client testnet. This will require coordination between all eth2.0 teams. With @zscole of whiteblock, we have informally been planning cross-client testnets between particular teams but we will definitely need something more organized.
The requirements to get to a cross-client testnet are kind of up in the air but here's a rough list of what needs to be done:

  • State tests for making sure that clients are indeed building and verifying state accordingly
  • A wire protocol for communicating between clients
  • interop tests for networking
  • determine the specifics of the p2p stack

@lrettig
Copy link
Member

lrettig commented Mar 21, 2019

Sounds reasonable, with the caveat that the Herders are more focused on people and processes than on tech -- so for instance I suspect they're not the right group to manage tests, protocols, or specs directly, but they could help make sure these things are being done effectively. I'll add it to the next meeting agenda.

@DBrettRobertson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Response to ACTION ITEM 7.1.
The correct link for the Whiteblock's ProgPoW Analysis can be found: https://explorer.bounties.network/bounty/2502

@timbeiko
Copy link
Contributor

Could we add an agenda item to talk about how to better share the outcomes of AllCoreDevs? IMO adding summaries to the transcript and sharing those more visibly on Twitter, Reddit and Ethereum Magicians would be a low-effort, high-impact first step.

@DBrettRobertson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Meeting complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants